Comparison of Methods
Journal Articles Comparing Methods
Please send additional suggestions to email@example.com. Suggested articles will be reviewed and considered for inclusion by the AcademyHealth Methods Council.
Austin, P.C. et al. “A Comparison of the Ability of Different Propensity Score Models to Balance Measured Variables Between Treated and Untreated Subjects: a Monte Carlo Study,” Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, May 2006, pp. 734-753.
Basu A., and W.G. Manning, and J. Mullahy. "Comparing Alternative Models: Log vs Cox Proportional Hazard?" Health Economics, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2004, pp. 749-765.
Buntin, M.B. and A.M. Zaslavsky. “Too Much Ado About Two-Part Models and Transformation? Comparing Methods of Modeling Medicare Expenditures,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3, May 2004, pp. 525-542.
Manning, W.G. and J. Mullahy. “Estimating Log Models: To Transform or not to Transform?,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 20, No. 4, July 2001, pp. 461-94.
Mennemeyer, S. “Can Econometrics Rescue Epidemiology?,” Annals of Epidemilogy, Vol. 7, 1997, pp. 249-250.
Sidik, K. and J.N. Jonkman. “A Comparison of Heterogeneity Variance Estimators in Combining Results of Studies,” Statistics in Medicine, Vol 26, 2007, pp. 1964-1981.
Stukel, T. et al. "Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection Bias: Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods," The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 297, 2007, pp. 278-285.
Zohoori, N. “Does Endogeneity Matter? A Comparison of Empirical Analyses With and Without Control for Endogeneity,” Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 7, 1997, pp. 258-266.